La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org
The text defends two ideas: the first one affirms that high school is the strategic educational level in the system and has a pedagogical meaning in itself. Therefore, it is considered that it is a mistake to define it as intermediate, heteronomous between the grades of elementary school and university or the job market. The second idea questions that an author such as Antonio Gramsci could be used to justify both theoretically and dialectically an early professionalizing program for high school. This assertion is based on the philological and hermeneutic analysis of Gramsci’s texts. The study concludes that the implementation of quality unitary high schools in Brazil, requires deep reform of the regular high school, especially in the public sector.
En el origen: el posmarxismo académico. Laclau transformó esa semilla en propuesta populista. En Venezuela, con el chavismo, su adaptación fue catastrófica. En España, Podemos intenta ruidosamente su puesta en práctica. Available online: Letras Libres (Accessed July 25, 2016)
Frosini, FabioL'eccidio di Roccagorga e la «settimana rossa»: Gramsci, il «sovversivismo» e il fascismo
SOGGETTI:
Fascismo, Interpretazione di G. del; Settimana Rossa; Rivoluzione passiva
citazione
Frosini, Fabio,
L'eccidio di Roccagorga e la «settimana rossa»: Gramsci, il «sovversivismo» e il fascismo
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020180, livello=AP, titolo=L'eccidio di Roccagorga e la «settimana rossa»: Gramsci, il «sovversivismo» e il fascismo, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Frosini, Fabio], autorevoc=[Frosini, Fabio], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-001528], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Frosini, Fabio, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[ita], paese=[IT], abstract=
The Roccagorga massacre (January 1913) and the «Red Week» (June 1914) are two episodes to which Gramsci refers several times in his Prison Notebooks and in various articles published between 1916 and 1926. I shall argue that these are very precise references to the harsh debate which took place in Italy in the wake of these two episodes, involving the director of the PSI newspaper and the leader of the party's left wing, Benito Mussolini, the main representatives of the party, and several Italian politicians, writers and intellectuals. Mussolini drew a close connection between Roccagorga and the «Red Week», against and beyond the Socialist party's official line, arguing that this had been the first great attempt at an autonomous unification of the popular masses from southern and northern Italy. This argument is at the centre of Gramsci's interest in subsequent years, when he outlines his interpretation of fascism as a political movement which both expresses and disfigures the most profound aspirations and demands of the popular masses. In Mussolini's deviation within the socialist movement, these aspirations and demands found a development which was also an interruption, since they were channelled towards the form of «national socialism» that would eventually merge into nationalism and imperialism. In this sense, it can be said that the connection between Roccagorga and the «Red Week» is key to understanding the roots of Gramsci's qualification of fascism as a «passive revolution».
Rebucini, GianfrancoCulture, hégémonie et subjectivités. «Traductions» de Gramsci dans les sciences sociales critiques anglophones
SOGGETTI:
Antropologia; Scienze Sociali; Cultural Studies
citazione
Rebucini, Gianfranco,
Culture, hégémonie et subjectivités. «Traductions» de Gramsci dans les sciences sociales critiques anglophones
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020186, livello=AP, titolo=Culture, hégémonie et subjectivités. «Traductions» de Gramsci dans les sciences sociales critiques anglophones, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Rebucini, Gianfranco], autorevoc=[Rebucini, Gianfranco], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007835], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Rebucini, Gianfranco, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[fra], paese=[FR], abstract=This article examines the legacy of Gramscian thought in Anglophone social sciences. It focuses in particular on three currents or disciplines, namely Cultural Studies, Anthropology, and Gender Studies. All three have sought and sometimes found in Gramscian categories a number of theoretical and political instruments through which to think the structures of domination, individual or collective subjectivity, and their relation to culture, in particular through the use of the dialectical relationship of hegemony/subalternity. Demonstrating how Gramsci was received in the intellectual and political Anglophone context, the article highlights certain genealogies which have sometimes led to what amounts to a number of fully-fledged "translations" of Gramscian concepts, but also to a series of "lighter", more distant uses. In this perspective, the article focuses on the translation of Gramsci undertaken by the New Left in the Seventies, insofar as this detour has proved of capital importance for the successive interpretations of Gramscian theories in the Anglophone social sciences., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Actuel Marx], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[1], relazioni_numero_issue=[57], relazioni_start=[82], relazioni_end=[95], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150101-20151231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Parigi], relazioni_editore=[PUF], relazioni_paese=[FR], soggettivoc=[Antropologia, Scienze Sociali, Cultural Studies], subjectvoc=[Anthropology, Social Science, Cultural Studies], note_riservate=, source=Cairn.info, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020186, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Nel saggio sono considerati gli articoli che Gramsci scrive durante gli anni torinesi tra lautunno del 1914 e lestate del 1919. Si tratta di un periodo peculiare della vicenda amsciana, segnato, per un verso, dalla chiusura del garzonato universitario e degli sbocchi lavorativi ad esso collegati, per laltro, dallinizio del giornalismo politico e della militanza socialista. Nei suoi scritti, il giovane socialista si confronta con la guerra e, successivamente, con la Rivoluzione: si trova costretto ad aggiornare una lezione storica marxiana non pi in grado di rendere conto dello sconvolgimento in atto; contemporaneamente, inizia un ripensamento della politica socialista che trover piena forma solo nellOrdine Nuovo. Questa riflessione storico-politica trova un solido ancoraggio nello studio della trincea, luogo in cui il conflitto di classe sembra presentarsi spiritualmente in modi affatto analoghi alla fabbrica. Available online: Il Contributo (Accessed October 19, 2016)
Caruso, LorisGramsci's political thought and the contemporary crisis of politics
SOGGETTI:
Populismo; Movimenti Sociali; Democrazia
citazione
Caruso, Loris,
Gramsci's political thought and the contemporary crisis of politics
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020303, livello=AP, titolo=Gramsci's political thought and the contemporary crisis of politics, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Caruso, Loris], autorevoc=[Caruso, Loris], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007654], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Caruso, Loris, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=In the context of the worsening economic crisis analogies tend to be drawn between the economic and political crisis in Europe of the 1920s and 1930s and the current situation. Now as then, it is argued, there is the risk that a systemic economic crisis and the crisis of representative politics will in turn lead to authoritarian outcomes. Rarer, however, is the idea that the current political and economic crisis may lead to a "progressive" outcome. This article examines both options under the light of the thinking of one of the most important interpreters of political crisis and change in the 1920s and 1930s: Antonio Gramsci. One of the central arguments in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks is the crisis of parliamentarism and democratic politics. Gramsci did not limit his analysis to the crisis however. His theoretical undertaking also consisted in the attempt to imagine the conditions for moving beyond the democratic crisis in a progressive manner. What emerges is an existing continuity between the Gramscian categories of Cesarism-Bonapartism, economic-corporative State, hegemonic crisis and contemporary politics, particularly with reference to phenomena such as populism, technocracy and neo-liberalism; the utility of the conceptual category of Passive Revolution to comprehend the current forms of exerting power and building social consent; the potential fruitfulness of Gramsci's schemata on counter-hegemonies, to understand the changes in the party-organization and the possibilities of building counter-hegemonies., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Thesis Eleven], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[136], relazioni_numero_issue=[1], relazioni_start=[140], relazioni_end=[160], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[October 2016], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20161001-20161031], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[SAGE Publications], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Populismo, Movimenti Sociali, Democrazia], subjectvoc=[Populism, Social Movements, Democracy], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020303, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Cox, Robert W.Gramsci, hegemonía y relaciones internacionales: Un ensayo sobre el método
FA PARTE DI:
Relaciones Internacionales, February - May 2016, pp. 137 - 152
SOGGETTI:
Egemonia; Diplomazia; Rivoluzione Passiva; Relazioni Internazionali; Guerra Di Movimento; Blocco Storico
citazione
Cox, Robert W.,
Gramsci, hegemonía y relaciones internacionales: Un ensayo sobre el método, in Relaciones Internacionales, pp. 137 - 152
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020705, livello=AP, titolo=Gramsci, hegemonía y relaciones internacionales: Un ensayo sobre el método, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Cox, Robert W., López del Castillo, Elisa], autorevoc=[Cox, Robert W., López del Castillo, Elisa], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-001595, IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-008028], responsability_ruolo=[author, traduttore], first_author=Cox, Robert W., forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], paese=[ES], abstract=
This article is a classic and fundamental for approaching global power relations with the conceptual tools developed by Gramsci. Cox contributes to critical thought in International Relations by discussing various gramscian concepts and what their implications are for the study of different historical forms of hegemony and counter-hegemony. Also, the author draws our attention -novel at the time of its publicaction- to the relevance of taking into account the construction of domestic counter-hegemonic historic blocs. He suggests that these could have a revolutionary effect on international structures and organizations, as well as rupture with the hegemony performed by the transnational economic order.
Bank, BerkerGramsci'nin Devlet ve Hegemonya Kavramlarının Kuramsal Çözümlemesi. (Theoretical Analysis of State and Hegemony Concepts of Gramsci. With English summary.)
FA PARTE DI:
Journal of Social Sciences, 2, October 2015, pp. 2 - 40
citazione
Bank, Berker,
Gramsci'nin Devlet ve Hegemonya Kavramlarının Kuramsal Çözümlemesi. (Theoretical Analysis of State and Hegemony Concepts of Gramsci. With English summary.), in Journal of Social Sciences, October 2015, pp. 2 - 40
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020708, livello=AP, titolo=Gramsci'nin Devlet ve Hegemonya Kavramlarının Kuramsal Çözümlemesi. (Theoretical Analysis of State and Hegemony Concepts of Gramsci. With English summary.), sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Bank, Berker], autorevoc=[Bank, Berker], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-008029], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Bank, Berker, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=October 2015, forma_normalizzata=20151001-20151031, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[tur], paese=[TR], abstract=Gramsci made a huge contribution in the development of Marxist theory by both re-examining a series of concept set such as civil society, state, fascism, and class, which have progressed in Western Europe political intellectual history, within conventional prologue of Marxist political theory and developing the new ones instead of those aforementioned.
His studies were not limited to the studies he had implemented for the solution of existing problems and the review of genuine circumstances of Italian society, and have made important developments about the review of historical blocks created by different capitalist social formations.
The main research question which is the subject of this study reflects an attempt for understanding the social function of "state" and "hegemony" in respect of enabling the continuity of "historical block" which progresses based on a given social formation determined by historical conditions. In this targeted context, based on the main debate texts of Gramsci, concepts of capitalist state, hegemony, counterhegemony,
war of positions are emphasized., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=FIG: Cassetta-Fubini, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Journal of Social Sciences], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[VIII], relazioni_numero_issue=[2], relazioni_start=[2], relazioni_end=[40], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[October 2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20151001-20151031], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Elazığ], relazioni_editore=[Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Türkçe Eğitimi Bölümü], relazioni_paese=[TR], note_riservate=201510_Journalofsocialsciences_Berker, source=ProQuest, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020708, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Burgos, RaúlThe Ups and Downs of an Uncomfortable Legacy: The Complicated Dialogue between Gramsci and the Latin American Left
FA PARTE DI:
Latin American Perspectives, 5, September 2015, pp. 169 - 185
SOGGETTI:
Teoria Politica; Latin America
citazione
Burgos, Raúl,
The Ups and Downs of an Uncomfortable Legacy: The Complicated Dialogue between Gramsci and the Latin American Left, in Latin American Perspectives, September 2015, pp. 169 - 185
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020709, livello=AP, titolo=The Ups and Downs of an Uncomfortable Legacy, sottotitolo=The Complicated Dialogue between Gramsci and the Latin American Left, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Burgos, Raúl], autorevoc=[Burgos, Raúl], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-005947], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Burgos, Raúl, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=September 2015, forma_normalizzata=20150901-20150931, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], paese=[US], abstract=The ideas originating in Antonio Gramsci's politico-theoretical work, in a multifaceted itinerary departing from a purely ethical matrix, have developed in Latin America into a
sophisticated theoretical formulation focused on the theory of hegemony. The emergence of this formulation marks the beginning of a complex process of reformulation of the
classic paradigms of the left, producing a drastic change in thinking about the logic of social transformation in Latin America. With this shift the issues of strategic design and the
transformational process began to undergo thorough debate. The theoretical tasks presented by the current development of Gramscian thought toward the construction of a
comprehensive theory of hegemony include the classical political and cultural dimension and the productive dimension of hegemonic actions. / Las ideas oriundas en la
elaboracion teorico-politica de Antonio Gramsci, en un itinerario multifacetico a partir de una matriz puramente etica, desenvuelven su contenido hasta ser expuestas en la forma
de una formulacion teorica sofisticada centrada en la teoria de la hegemonia. La emergencia de este momento marca el inicio de un complejo proceso de reelaboracion de los
paradigmas clasicos de la izquierda, constituyendo un cambio severo en el modo de pensar la logica de la transformacion social en America Latina. En este viraje las cuestiones
del diseno estrategico y del sujeto del proceso transformador seran puestos en discusion radical. Las tareas teoricas planteadas por el desarrollo actual del pensamiento
gramsciano hacia la construccion de una teoria integral incluyen las clasicas dimensiones politica y cultural y la dimension productiva de acciones hegemonicas., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Latin American Perspectives], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[42], relazioni_numero_issue=[5], relazioni_start=[169], relazioni_end=[185], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[September 2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150901-20150931], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Riverside], relazioni_editore=[SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Teoria Politica, Latin America], subjectvoc=[Political theory, Latin American], note_riservate=, source=ProQuest, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020709, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Through the Prison Notebooks and the papers left by Sraffa, it is possible to attempt a reconstruction of the intellectual paths taken by the two authors and discover unexpected convergences, as well as obvious differences. The key concept employed here is that of the 'translatability of scientific languages'. From this concept, Boothman has argued, stems the 'open' character of Gramsci's Marxism. The theme of the translatability of languages is also present in Sraffa: in a Note written after the important theoretical turning point of the summer of 1927, he states his intention to write a book that will consist in the translation of Marx into English, that is in the translation of the 'metaphysics' of Hegel into that of Hume. It can be shown that issues that have a prominent importance in Gramsci's thought help us to understand the meaning and importance of Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities.
, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Contributions to Political Economy, Centro Sraffa working papers [online]], relazioni_identificativo=[, ], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre, ristampato], relazioni_numero_volume=[34, 1], relazioni_numero_issue=[1, ], relazioni_start=[31, ], relazioni_end=[76, ], relazioni_pagine=[, ], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[June 2015, April 2014], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150601-20150631, 20140401-20140431], relazioni_tipo_data=[, ], relazioni_luogo=[Cambridge, Roma], relazioni_editore=[Cambridge University Press, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa"], relazioni_paese=[GB, IT], soggettivoc=[Sraffa, Piero, Ricardo, David, Economia Politica, Marxismo], subjectvoc=[Sraffa, Piero, Ricardo, David, Political Economy, Marxism], note_riservate=, source=ProQuest, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020712, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
The following texts concern the Gramsci Monument an artwork realized in the Bronx, New York, in 2013, commissioned by Dia Art Foundation. They were written before, during, and after the Gramsci Monument experience and were diffused on the website that was part of the artwork. They will be published in the book Gramsci Monument, (Konig Books and Dia Art Foundation, 2015). In these texts the artist struggles to understand, to fix in place, and to insist on what matters when making art in public space today. Reprinted by Taylor & Francis Ltd.
This essay examines the importance of Antonio Gramsci's concepts of hegemony and dominance for anticolonial movements. Hegemony is a practice of power that rests substantially on the consent of various strata achieved by groups possessing or seeking state power, whereas dominance relies primarily on coercion. Subaltern groups and revolutionary parties, Gramsci argues, must displace ruling-class hegemony and become hegemonic themselves before assuming state power. But not all ruling classes are integrally hegemonic. As Ranajit Guha argues, colonialism represents 'dominance without hegemony.' Examining Frantz Fanon's discussion of anticolonial nationalism, I argue that even in situations of apparent dominance without hegemony, subaltern classes and revolutionary parties must achieve hegemony before state power for genuine decolonization. The essay argues that the emergence, consolidation, and problematic outcomes of FRELIMO's (Front for the Liberation of Mozambique) resistance to Portuguese colonialism indicate the need to pay close attention to the dialectic of hegemony before dominance. Reprinted by Taylor & Francis Ltd
One of the most important features of Gramsci's social theory was his analysis of the distinction between war of maneuver and war of position. In the context of a relatively underdeveloped civil society such as is found in the 'East,' he argued, revolutionary strategy required a direct frontal assault-a war of maneuver-against the principal form of bourgeois political power: the state. In the 'West,' however, with its more fully developed civil society, such a direct, lightning frontal assault against the state must be a slower, more protracted process of siege warfare, a war of position, in which subordinate classes wear away the existing civil society and, through their self-organization, create a new one (Gramsci 1971). Adapted from the source document.
, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Socialism and Democracy], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[29], relazioni_numero_issue=[1], relazioni_start=[102], relazioni_end=[124], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[March 2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150301-20150331], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Abingdon], relazioni_editore=[Taylor&Francis Ltd], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Società Civile, Guerra di movimento/guerra di posizione], subjectvoc=[Civil Society, War of movement-war of position], note_riservate=, source=ProQuest, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020718, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Morfino, Vittorio,
Althusser as a Reader of Gramsci, in Actuel Marx, pp. 62 - 81
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020719, livello=AP, titolo=Althusser as a Reader of Gramsci, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Morfino, Vittorio], autorevoc=[Morfino, Vittorio], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-003890], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Morfino, Vittorio, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[fra], paese=[FR], abstract=
The paper examines Althusser's readings of Gramsci, from the first critical notes and annotations to his writings on the crisis of Marxism. It highlights the profound ambivalence of Althusser's interpretations. On the one hand, Gramsci is presented as a precursor, as the only figure within the Marxist tradition deemed to have attempted to think the superstructure, and in particular the political. On the other side, the Gramscian corpus is criticized as the paradigmatic instance of a conception of temporality and politics with which Althusser is in disagreement. Regarding the Althusserian critique, we here identify two distinct phases: starting out from a critique of the lack of knowledge of the specific status of science in general, especially of the science of history, characteristic of the second half of the sixties, Althusser would, in the late seventies, formulate a critique of the Gramscian concept of hegemony which, in his view, erases the question of class domination.
Yıldırım, Yavuz - Gezen, Aysun2000'li Yıllarda Gramsci'yi Anlamak: Ortak Duyunun Kaynağı Olarak Toplumsal Hareketlerin Önem
FA PARTE DI:
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/Journal of Social Sciences, 1, April 2014, pp. 197 - 216
SOGGETTI:
Senso Comune; Globalizzazione
citazione
Yıldırım, Yavuz,
2000'li Yıllarda Gramsci'yi Anlamak: Ortak Duyunun Kaynağı Olarak Toplumsal Hareketlerin Önem, in Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 197 - 216
The concepts of Gramsci offer a critical framework for the scholars who want to draw up a new social struggle and socialism perspective. The question of whether the political party as the organisation of social transformation leaves its place to the social movements that are called as postmodern prince is one of the ongoing debate of this issue. The continuity of the war of position in the intellectual and moral transformation foreseen by Gramsci by embracing the civil society can be meaningful for understanding the struggles that the new social movements run These movements, especially on globalization issue, make efforts to create a new common sense and a perception of the world against established hegemony. Evolution of these efforts to a revolutionary process depends on the augmentation of the areas of cooperation of the movements. This article examines how Gramsci’s thinking and especially the notion of common sense corresponds to the social movements because the point of view based on a pluralist interpretation of Gramsci’s thoughts overlaps with the initiations of the social movements especially in the counter globalization process.