La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org
Morton, Adam David,
The Limits of Sociological Marxism?
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020017, livello=AP, titolo=The Limits of Sociological Marxism?, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Morton, Adam David], autorevoc=[Morton, Adam David], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-003913], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Morton, Adam David, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, abstract=Within the agenda of historical-materialist theory and practice Sociological Marxism has
delivered a compelling perspective on how to explore and link the analysis of civil society, the state, and the economy within an explicit focus on class exploitation, emancipation, and rich ethnography. This article situates a major analysis of state formation, the rise of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), and the growth of a broader Islamist movement in Turkey within the main current of Sociological Marxism. It does so in order to critically examine the rather bold revision of the theory of hegemony at the heart of Cihan Tuğal's Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism, which posits the separate interaction of political society, civil society and the state in theorising hegemonic politics in Turkey. My contention is that the revision of hegemony that this analysis offers and its state-theoretical commitments are deeply problematic due to the reliance on what I term 'ontological exteriority', meaning the treatment of state, civil society and the economy as always-already separate spheres. The focus of the critique then moves toward highlighting a frustrating lack of direct engagement with Antonio Gramsci's writings in this disquisition on hegemony and passive revolution, which has important political consequences. While praise for certain aspects of ethnographic and spatial analysis is raised, it is argued that any account of the reordering of hegemony and the restructuring of spatial-temporal contexts of capital accumulation through conditions of passive revolution also needs to draw from a more sophisticated state theory, a direct reading of Gramsci, and broader scalar analysis of spatial relations and uneven development under capitalism., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Historical Materialism], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[21], relazioni_numero_issue=[1], relazioni_start=[129], relazioni_end=[158], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2013], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20130101-20131231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[], soggettivoc=[Sociologia Marxista, Materialismo Storico, Egemonia], subjectvoc=[Marxist Sociology, Historical materialism, Hegemony], note_riservate=, source=IGS-Int_2013, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020017, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Carley, RobertAgile Materialisms: Antonio Gramsci, Stuart Hall, Racialization, and Modernity
SOGGETTI:
Materialismo Storico; Hall, Stuart
citazione
Carley, Robert,
Agile Materialisms: Antonio Gramsci, Stuart Hall, Racialization, and Modernity
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020019, livello=AP, titolo=Agile Materialisms, sottotitolo=Antonio Gramsci, Stuart Hall, Racialization, and Modernity, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Carley, Robert], autorevoc=[Carley, Robert], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007768], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Carley, Robert, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, abstract=This article investigates why Gramsci's theories and concepts have a discrete relevance to the study of race and ethnicity in contemporary contexts. Two theoretical points emerge from the investigation. First, through Gramsci's work, Hall's approach to the structural/cultural theory problem provides an important mediation for theoretical approaches to race. Hall is then able to demonstrate that the racialization of labor and the coercion of workers in colonial and neocolonial contexts, with regard to the "global south" was the rule and not the exception. Second, through an historical and discursive approach, I demonstrate how Gramsci's analysis of politics and political strategies took race into account. I contend that Gramsci's perspective on race facilitated Hall's ability to deploy Gramsci's theoretical framework and concepts., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Journal of Historical Sociology], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[26], relazioni_numero_issue=[4], relazioni_start=[413], relazioni_end=[441], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2013], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20130101-20131231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[], soggettivoc=[Materialismo Storico, Hall, Stuart], subjectvoc=[Historical materialism, Hall, Stuart], note_riservate=, source=IGS-Int_2013, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020019, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Olsaretti, AlessandroBeyond Class: The Many Facets of Gramsci's Theory of Intellectuals.
FA PARTE DI:
Journal of Classical Sociology, 4, November 2014, pp. 363 - 381
SOGGETTI:
Intellettuali; Egemonia
citazione
Olsaretti, Alessandro,
Beyond Class: The Many Facets of Gramsci's Theory of Intellectuals., in Journal of Classical Sociology, pp. 363 - 381
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020020, livello=AP, titolo=Beyond Class: The Many Facets of Gramsci's Theory of Intellectuals., sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Olsaretti, Alessandro], autorevoc=[Olsaretti, Alessandro], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007691], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Olsaretti, Alessandro, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], paese=[GB], abstract=
Gramsci’s theory of intellectuals is widely cited but rarely closely studied. This article makes a case for a rereading of this theory. This is both desirable and necessary because, as the article shows, it is a more nuanced and yet also encompassing theory than recognized in current scholarship on the sociology of intellectuals, and it actually has much to contribute to a comprehensive modern sociology of intellectuals. This is chiefly by the way it took class into account while transcending it. Far from being limited to a description of intellectuals as class-bound, Gramsci’s theory in fact also saw intellectuals as class-less and a class-in-themselves. It also took into account intrinsic qualities of intellectual production and can contribute to questions in subaltern studies and the study of counter-hegemony.
Egan, DanielRethinking War of Maneuver/War of Position: Gramsci and the Military Metaphor.
SOGGETTI:
Guerra di movimento/guerra di posizione; Marxismo; Sociologia Marxista
citazione
Egan, Daniel,
Rethinking War of Maneuver/War of Position: Gramsci and the Military Metaphor.
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020021, livello=AP, titolo=Rethinking War of Maneuver/War of Position, sottotitolo=Gramsci and the Military Metaphor., tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Egan, Daniel], autorevoc=[Egan, Daniel], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-006313], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Egan, Daniel, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=
One of the most important components of Antonio Gramsci's social theory is his discussion of political strategy, particularly his distinction between 'war of maneuver' and 'war of position'. For Gramsci, the classical model of revolution through military insurrection (war of maneuver) has been supplanted within advanced capitalism by a cultural struggle of much longer duration and complexity (war of position). Despite the significance of Gramsci's analysis of war of maneuver/war of position for contemporary Marxism, it is striking that so little attention has been paid to these terms. These terms have a history, both in military theory and in Marxism, which predates Gramsci's prison notebooks. An examination of the military writings of Engels, Lenin and Trotsky, which are grounded more directly on military theory, leads to different conclusions about the nature of political strategy and the relationship between war of maneuver and war of position.
A more recent version of this article was published on 06-10-2014
Rehmann, JanOccupy Wall Street and the Question of Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis
SOGGETTI:
Egemonia; Intellettuali Organici
citazione
Rehmann, Jan,
Occupy Wall Street and the Question of Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020023, livello=AP, titolo=Occupy Wall Street and the Question of Hegemony, sottotitolo=A Gramscian Analysis, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Rehmann, Jan], autorevoc=[Rehmann, Jan], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-004647], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Rehmann, Jan, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=Several books and articles have already been published on the emergence, dynamics and defeat (at the least temporary) of the Occupy movements in the U.S. To date, Gramsci's theory of hegemony has not played a major role in the evaluation of this political trajectory. In regard to Occupy Wall Street (OWS) this is certainly no coincidence. It is indeed easy to list several reasons why a Gramscian approach to OWS is problematic. Isn't it obvious that OWS's claim to be a "leader-less movement" clashes with Gramsci's description of leadership in terms of educating "organic intellectual?" Gramsci's prospective of uniting the industrial proletariat and forging class alliance with the peasants and other subaltern classes through a political party, which meant at the time Communist Party of Italy, part of the Third International, would be rejected by many of those involved in OWS as reflecting an outdated centralist model of representation. For David Graebe the left is neatly divided into "verticalists" and "horizontalists" so that OWS becomes a case in point to demonstrate the virtues of anarchism as against the failures of the Marxist left., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Socialism and Democracy], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[27], relazioni_numero_issue=[1], relazioni_start=[1], relazioni_end=[18], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[03.2013], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20130301-20130331], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[], soggettivoc=[Egemonia, Intellettuali Organici], subjectvoc=[Hegemony, Organic Intellectuals], note_riservate=, source=IGS-Int_2013, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020023, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Thomas, Peter D.Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern Prince
SOGGETTI:
Moderno principe; Egemonia; Rivoluzione passiva
citazione
Thomas, Peter D.,
Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern Prince
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020024, livello=AP, titolo=Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern Prince, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Thomas, Peter D.], autorevoc=[Thomas, Peter D.], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007157], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Thomas, Peter D., forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=
Gramsci's concept of hegemony has been interpreted in a wide variety of ways, including a theory of consent, of political unity, of ‘anti-politics', and of geopolitical competition. These interpretations are united in regarding hegemony as a general theory of political power and domination, and as deriving from a particular interpretation of the concept of passive revolution. Building upon the recent intense season of philological research on the Prison Notebooks, this article argues that the concept of hegemony is better understood as a ‘dialectical chain' composed of four integrally related ‘moments': hegemony as social and political leadership, as a political project, as a hegemonic apparatus, and as the social and political hegemony of the workers' movement. This alternative typology of hegemony provides both a sophisticated analysis of the emergence of modern state power and a theory of political organization of the subaltern social groups. This project is encapsulated in Gramsci's notion of the formation of a ‘modern Prince', conceived as both political party and civilizational process, which represents an emancipatory alternative to the dominant forms of political modernity.
Available online: academia.edu (Accessed December 09, 2016)
Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio - Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de AlencarAntonio Gramsci e a organização da escola italiana (1922-1932)
SOGGETTI:
Educazione (Pedagogia); Quaderni del carcere
citazione
Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio,
Antonio Gramsci e a organização da escola italiana (1922-1932)
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020026, livello=AP, titolo=Antonio Gramsci e a organização da escola italiana (1922-1932), sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de Alencar], autorevoc=[Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de Alencar], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007531, IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007532], responsability_ruolo=[author, author], first_author=Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[por], paese=[BR], abstract=
This paper analyzes the educational thought of Antonio Gramsci (1981-1937) about the Italian school organization between the years 1922 and 1932 and historically contextualizes the gramscian analysis and marks the ripening of his ideas presented in Quaderni del Carcere. Gramsci analyzed the educational reform of the fascist State, known as ´Gentile Reform´ (1922-1923) and pointed out that it was returned to the maintenance of cultural privileges of one group over the other, preventing the access of the subalterns to the university and the humanistic culture. Promoted by Giovanni Gentile (1875-1944) and Giuseppe Lombardo-Radice (1879-1938), the Italian school organization was regarded as democratic, because it extended the offer of vocational education and allowed the entry of the subalterns in the job market. In Notebook 12, Gramsci (2007) criticized the Italian school organization and its seemingly democratic character and proposed the creation of a single school, forming the general culture, humanistic, philosophical, and disinterested in the immediate formation of the worker.
Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio - Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de AlencarEducação e hegemonia nos Quaderni del Carcere de Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937)
SOGGETTI:
Coscienza di classe; Egemonia
citazione
Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio,
Educação e hegemonia nos Quaderni del Carcere de Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937)
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020027, livello=AP, titolo=Educação e hegemonia nos Quaderni del Carcere de Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de Alencar], autorevoc=[Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, Arnaut de Toledo, Cézar de Alencar], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007531, IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007532], responsability_ruolo=[author, author], first_author=Gomes, Jarbas Mauricio, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[por], paese=[BR], abstract=
The struggle for hegemony and the action of intellectuals in the cultural formation of social groups, subjects which are the central theme of Antonio Gramsci's (1891-1937) analyses, have shown the importance of education for the consolidation of a hegemony, whether through schooling or non-school education, carried out by political parties and trade unions. The aim of this paper is to analyze the ideas underlying Gramsci's propositions on education taking as its starting point a study of the Quaderni del carcere, as it showed that the educational action undertaken by intellectual groups was impregnated by/with contradictions which influenced the development and success of the working classes in drawing up a counter hegemony.
The current study analysis the Antonio Gramsci's educational thought (1891-1937) and explores the relation between cultural issue and the gramscian's educative program, the Unitary School, and highlights its dialectical character. It's a reading of the Gramsci's work that demonstrated the dialectical character of his thought. By proposing the Unitary School, Gramsci defended a free and quality school for everyone it was able to promoting a pedagogical work in the appropriation of the general culture, humanist, serve as an instrument for the acquisition of discipline and the autonomy necessary to the physical and intellectual development of the new generations.
Morton, Adam DavidViajando con Gramsci: la espacialidad de la revolución pasiva
SOGGETTI:
Rivoluzione passiva
citazione
Morton, Adam David,
Viajando con Gramsci: la espacialidad de la revolución pasiva
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020037, livello=AP, titolo=Viajando con Gramsci: la espacialidad de la revolución pasiva, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Morton, Adam David], autorevoc=[Morton, Adam David], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-003913], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Morton, Adam David, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], paese=[MX], abstract=
The article is a version of the presentation at the convention "Usos de Gramsci en la Teoría Social y Política" [Uses of Gramsci in Social and political theory] held at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), in Mexico City (November 14-17, 2011). A version is available on the web
Casco, José M.O Gramsci de Portantiero.: Cultura, política e intelectuais na Argentina da pós-guerra
SOGGETTI:
Socialismo; Intellettuali
citazione
Casco, José M.,
O Gramsci de Portantiero.: Cultura, política e intelectuais na Argentina da pós-guerra
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020038, livello=AP, titolo=O Gramsci de Portantiero., sottotitolo=Cultura, política e intelectuais na Argentina da pós-guerra, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Casco, José M.], autorevoc=[Casco, José M.], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007773], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Casco, José M., forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], abstract=
This work focuses on the intellectual production of Portantiero linked to the work of Antonio Gramsci. To do this, he reviews some moments of his work taking care of the sociopolitical and the different configurations of the intellectual field context. The main objective of this article is to attend the meeting Portantiero with Gramsci's work deciphering the modulations that acquires reception in his work, considering the way it operated as a breaking point at times of political and intellectual trajectory and how at the same time it made sense to occupy a prominent place in the intellectual field.
Also available on the web: Acta Sociologica(Accessed June 24, 2016)
Ortega Reyna, JaimeAbrindo horizontes: Sociedade civil, Estado e hegemonia na obra de Carlos Pereyra
SOGGETTI:
Società Civile; Intellettuali; Marxismo
citazione
Ortega Reyna, Jaime,
Abrindo horizontes: Sociedade civil, Estado e hegemonia na obra de Carlos Pereyra
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020039, livello=AP, titolo=Abrindo horizontes, sottotitolo=Sociedade civil, Estado e hegemonia na obra de Carlos Pereyra, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Ortega Reyna, Jaime], autorevoc=[Ortega Reyna, Jaime], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007774], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Ortega Reyna, Jaime, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], abstract=
In this paper is present some of the main ideas developed by Carlos Pereyra around the subjects of politics, the State and civil society. We review his reflections on this notions, placing them in the context of the reception of the intellectual legacy of Antonio Gramsci. Also, we expose the main ideas of Pereyra in the context of the Mexican State during the political conjuncture of the seveties. Our purpose is to locate the thread of continuity between Pereyra's thought and Marxist political theory.
Also available on the web: Acta Sociologica (Accessed June 24, 2016)
Hernán, OuviñaLa política prefigurativa de los movimientos populares en América Latina.: Hacia una nueva matriz de intelección para las Ciencias Sociales
SOGGETTI:
Filosofia Della Praxis; Movimenti Sociali; America Latina
citazione
Hernán, Ouviña,
La política prefigurativa de los movimientos populares en América Latina.: Hacia una nueva matriz de intelección para las Ciencias Sociales
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020040, livello=AP, titolo=La política prefigurativa de los movimientos populares en América Latina., sottotitolo=Hacia una nueva matriz de intelección para las Ciencias Sociales, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Hernán, Ouviña], autorevoc=[Hernán, Ouviña], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007775], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Hernán, Ouviña, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], abstract=
The main objective of this article is to recover the notion of prefigurative politics as a potential "measuring unit" which allows for the analysis of the scopes and limitations of the innovative modes of organization and struggle put forward by the Latin-American social movements, with the purpose of confronting it with some of the concrete experiences that exist in Latin America. After defining prefigurative politics as a set of practices and social relations that, in the present moment, "anticipate" the germs of a future society, it is fundamented why this category might constitute a pertinent notion to approach this new processes, in which social movements emerge as a weighty collective actor by installing in the public agenda certain claims and demands, and influencing state institutions, but without their integration or subsumption to their government structures.
Also available on the web: Acta Sociológica(Accessed June 24, 2016)
Hernán, FairDebates teóricos e intelectuais da teoria da hegemonia de Ernesto Laclau com/contra as tradições marxistas e das esquerdas: ¿teoria pós-marxista?
SOGGETTI:
Egemonia; Postmarxismo; Laclau, Ernest
citazione
Hernán, Fair,
Debates teóricos e intelectuais da teoria da hegemonia de Ernesto Laclau com/contra as tradições marxistas e das esquerdas: ¿teoria pós-marxista?
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020041, livello=AP, titolo=Debates teóricos e intelectuais da teoria da hegemonia de Ernesto Laclau com/contra as tradições marxistas e das esquerdas: ¿teoria pós-marxista?, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Hernán, Fair], autorevoc=[Hernán, Fair], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007776], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Hernán, Fair, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[spa], abstract=
The article problematizes the self-positioning of Laclau's theory of hegemony in the "post-Marxist" field and in socialist traditions, from the analysis of the positions and debates with the intellectual thinkers who questioned him from Marxist and leftist traditions. Based on the analysis of their convergences, theoretical tensions and onto-epistemological ruptures with/ against Marxist and socialist traditions, it seeks to contribute to evaluate the validity of the criticism and, at the same time, promote a greater dialogism and debate with these theoretical, social and political conceptions.
Also available on the web: Acta Sociológica (Accessed June 24, 2016)
Holst, John D.The Revolutionary Party in Gramsci's Pre-Prison Educational and Political Theory and Practice
FA PARTE DI:
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 6, Ottobre 2009, pp. 622 - 639
SOGGETTI:
Scuola Di Partito; Educazione Per Adulti
citazione
Holst, John D.,
The Revolutionary Party in Gramsci's Pre-Prison Educational and Political Theory and Practice, in Educational Philosophy and Theory, pp. 622 - 639
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020095, livello=AP, titolo=The Revolutionary Party in Gramsci's Pre-Prison Educational and Political Theory and Practice, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Holst, John D.], autorevoc=[Holst, John D.], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007793], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Holst, John D., forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=While most of Gramsci's party work is well known to education scholars of Gramsci, and the educational aspects of his writings have been repeatedly analyzed, what remains a constant in education-based Gramsci studies is the nearly universal minimization of this work for what it was, namely party work. For Gramsci, it would have been unthinkable to consider this work outside the framework of a revolutionary party. Yet, for contemporary educational scholars it seems unthinkable to consider Gramsci's work within the framework of a revolutionary party. The goals of this article are to outline Gramsci's interrelated conceptualization of the roles of the revolutionary party; the nature of education within and by the revolutionary party; and the aims of party education. For considerations of space, I limit this analysis to Gramsci's pre-prison praxis, the period of his active militancy in the PSI and the PCI. I conclude the article with what I consider to be lessons with continued relevance from Gramsci's praxis for the socio-political economic context faced by today's radical educators., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Educational Philosophy and Theory], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[41], relazioni_numero_issue=[6], relazioni_start=[622], relazioni_end=[639], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[Ottobre 2009], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Department of Leadership, Policy and Administration, University of St Thomas], relazioni_editore=[Wiley-Blackwell], relazioni_paese=[USA], soggettivoc=[Scuola Di Partito, Educazione Per Adulti], subjectvoc=[Education, Party Education], note_riservate=, source=Ingentaconnect.com, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020095, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
Bernhard, ArminWissen und Intellektualita: Antonio Gramscis Kritik an reformpadagogischen Bildungsvorstellungen und seine Epistemologie der Bildungsarbeit
SOGGETTI:
Educazione (Pedagogia); Filosofia, Teoria
citazione
Bernhard, Armin,
Wissen und Intellektualita: Antonio Gramscis Kritik an reformpadagogischen Bildungsvorstellungen und seine Epistemologie der Bildungsarbeit
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020096, livello=AP, titolo=Wissen und Intellektualita, sottotitolo=Antonio Gramscis Kritik an reformpadagogischen Bildungsvorstellungen und seine Epistemologie der Bildungsarbeit, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Bernhard, Armin], autorevoc=[Bernhard, Armin], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-000754], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Bernhard, Armin, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, abstract=This article examines the genesis of human cognition in terms of education (Bildung) based on Antonio Gramsci's practical-philosophical theory of history and society. First, a few general premises of contemporary Italian progressive education (Aktualismus; education activity) will be established, the criticism of which led Gramsci to the development of his own educational and politico-educational ideas. Then the theoretic-educational foundation of these ideas will be reconstructed, before outlining the relationship between the socialistic experience of certain childlike Episteme and education at school. The evolvement of the fundamental problems ensuing from this particular constellation of position, Gramscian theory holds, follows thereafter. In connection with this, the practical philosopher's ideas regarding educational policies and the formation of the educational system as well as schools will be expounded, which result as a consequence of his theoretic-educational considerations. The structure of this article pursues Gramsci's dialectic reconstruction work, which takes an interest in a critical sublation of theories, ideas and concepts according to a greater development of human culture, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Paedagogica Historica], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[45], relazioni_numero_issue=[4-5], relazioni_start=[631], relazioni_end=[643], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[August 2009], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20090801-20090831], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[Routledge], relazioni_paese=[], soggettivoc=[Educazione (Pedagogia), Filosofia, Teoria], subjectvoc=[Education, Philosophical theory, Cultural Studies], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020096, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
n the era of neoliberal capitalist globalization, two contradictory discoursesare clearly noticeable in civil society movement. On the one hand, devotedright-wing followers in civil society offer a militant view of the state and arguethat it must be challenged on the grounds of transparency, accountability, down-sizing, and so on. Such a view was long ago articulated by Locke. According tothis view, civil society is the bearer of rights and could be a source of resistance to the state, in case the state violates human rights. This view, as also Locke's view, does not seek to problematize civil society. On the contrary, civil society, in this view, is the principle organizer of human life. Such a view is usually foundin contemporary neoliberal critiques of the state today. On the other hand, various sections of the Left-using a productivist model of politics or a feminist model or environmentalism-wonder how civil society could be seen a source of resistance to state power because civil society legitimizes capitalism and the coercive state power. Both these pro-civil society stances and anti-civil society stances form a dichotomy in the era of capitalist globalization today. Aspects of the earlier dichotomy were perceived for the first time by Gramsci during the interwar period, while some other positions are a product of the contemporary era. For various reasons, as we shall see, Gramsci's original position on the subject is little known. However, Gramsci modifies both pro-civil society stances of liberalism (originally Locke's) and anti-civil society stances of the Left (originally Marx's). It is pertinent to recollect certain original positions communicated on these issues by Gramsci long ago. This article proposes certain middle grounds that have been recovered from Gramsci as a way out of the puzzle that emerges from this dualism.