The Bibliografia gramsciana, founded by John M. Cammett, and now edited by Francesco Giasi and Maria Luisa Righi, in collaboration with International Gramsci Society, is a database of books, papers and articles on Gramsci starting from 1922 and of editions of Gramsci’s writings as from 1927. Contact us for updates or corrections at: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org

  • Jackson, Robert On Bourdieu and Gramsci

    The theoretical confrontations between Pierre Bourdieu and Antonio Gramsci staged by Michael Burawoy in Conversations with Bourdieu (2012) and in the journal Sociol- ogy (2012) make an important contribution to our understanding of the relationship between these thinkers. As part of his wider project of 'Sociological Marxism', Burawoy juxtaposes the historicity of Gramsci's notion of hegemony with the durable nature of symbolic domination based on misrecognition in Bourdieu. While this contrast is illumi- nating, I argue that Burawoy's portrayal of Gramsci primarily as a theorist of consent is limited, and suffers from a lack of engagement with Gramsci scholarship drawing on the critical edition of his writings. I consider some of the opportunities presented by wider articulations of Bourdieu's work from a Marxist perspective, aiming to outline the terms within which a more sustained comparative study of Bourdieu and Gramsci might be attempted.

    FA PARTE DI: Gramsciana, 2016, 141-176
    SUBJECT:Common Sense; Bourdieu, Pierre; Sociology





    SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020775, livello=AP, titolo=On Bourdieu and Gramsci, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Jackson, Robert], autorevoc=[Jackson, Robert], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-002893], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Jackson, Robert, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=2016, forma_normalizzata=20160101-20161231, tipo_data=, consistenza=141-176 pp., lingua=[eng], paese=[IT], abstract=

    The theoretical confrontations between Pierre Bourdieu and Antonio Gramsci staged by Michael Burawoy in Conversations with Bourdieu (2012) and in the journal Sociol- ogy (2012) make an important contribution to our understanding of the relationship between these thinkers. As part of his wider project of 'Sociological Marxism', Burawoy juxtaposes the historicity of Gramsci's notion of hegemony with the durable nature of symbolic domination based on misrecognition in Bourdieu. While this contrast is illumi- nating, I argue that Burawoy's portrayal of Gramsci primarily as a theorist of consent is limited, and suffers from a lack of engagement with Gramsci scholarship drawing on the critical edition of his writings. I consider some of the opportunities presented by wider articulations of Bourdieu's work from a Marxist perspective, aiming to outline the terms within which a more sustained comparative study of Bourdieu and Gramsci might be attempted.

    , table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Gramsciana], relazioni_identificativo=[IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020767], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[2], relazioni_numero_issue=[], relazioni_start=[], relazioni_end=[], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2016], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20160101-20161231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Modena], relazioni_editore=[Mucchi Editore], relazioni_paese=[IT], soggettivoc=[Senso Comune, Bourdieu, Pierre, Sociologia], subjectvoc=[Common Sense, Bourdieu, Pierre, Sociology], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020775, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]

Free search