La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org

  • Jackson, Robert On Bourdieu and Gramsci

    The theoretical confrontations between Pierre Bourdieu and Antonio Gramsci staged by Michael Burawoy in Conversations with Bourdieu (2012) and in the journal Sociol- ogy (2012) make an important contribution to our understanding of the relationship between these thinkers. As part of his wider project of 'Sociological Marxism', Burawoy juxtaposes the historicity of Gramsci's notion of hegemony with the durable nature of symbolic domination based on misrecognition in Bourdieu. While this contrast is illumi- nating, I argue that Burawoy's portrayal of Gramsci primarily as a theorist of consent is limited, and suffers from a lack of engagement with Gramsci scholarship drawing on the critical edition of his writings. I consider some of the opportunities presented by wider articulations of Bourdieu's work from a Marxist perspective, aiming to outline the terms within which a more sustained comparative study of Bourdieu and Gramsci might be attempted.

    FA PARTE DI: Gramsciana, 2016, 141-176
    SOGGETTI:Senso Comune; Bourdieu, Pierre; Sociologia





    SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020775, livello=AP, titolo=On Bourdieu and Gramsci, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Jackson, Robert], autorevoc=[Jackson, Robert], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-002893], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Jackson, Robert, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=2016, forma_normalizzata=20160101-20161231, tipo_data=, consistenza=141-176 pp., lingua=[eng], paese=[IT], abstract=

    The theoretical confrontations between Pierre Bourdieu and Antonio Gramsci staged by Michael Burawoy in Conversations with Bourdieu (2012) and in the journal Sociol- ogy (2012) make an important contribution to our understanding of the relationship between these thinkers. As part of his wider project of 'Sociological Marxism', Burawoy juxtaposes the historicity of Gramsci's notion of hegemony with the durable nature of symbolic domination based on misrecognition in Bourdieu. While this contrast is illumi- nating, I argue that Burawoy's portrayal of Gramsci primarily as a theorist of consent is limited, and suffers from a lack of engagement with Gramsci scholarship drawing on the critical edition of his writings. I consider some of the opportunities presented by wider articulations of Bourdieu's work from a Marxist perspective, aiming to outline the terms within which a more sustained comparative study of Bourdieu and Gramsci might be attempted.

    , table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Gramsciana], relazioni_identificativo=[IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020767], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[2], relazioni_numero_issue=[], relazioni_start=[], relazioni_end=[], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2016], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20160101-20161231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Modena], relazioni_editore=[Mucchi Editore], relazioni_paese=[IT], soggettivoc=[Senso Comune, Bourdieu, Pierre, Sociologia], subjectvoc=[Common Sense, Bourdieu, Pierre, Sociology], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020775, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]

Ricerca libera