The paper examines Althusser's readings of Gramsci, from the first critical notes and annotations to his writings on the crisis of Marxism. It highlights the profound ambivalence of Althusser's interpretations. On the one hand, Gramsci is presented as a precursor, as the only figure within the Marxist tradition deemed to have attempted to think the superstructure, and in particular the political. On the other side, the Gramscian corpus is criticized as the paradigmatic instance of a conception of temporality and politics with which Althusser is in disagreement. Regarding the Althusserian critique, we here identify two distinct phases: starting out from a critique of the lack of knowledge of the specific status of science in general, especially of the science of history, characteristic of the second half of the sixties, Althusser would, in the late seventies, formulate a critique of the Gramscian concept of hegemony which, in his view, erases the question of class domination.
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020719, livello=AP, titolo=Althusser as a Reader of Gramsci, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Morfino, Vittorio], autorevoc=[Morfino, Vittorio], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-003890], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Morfino, Vittorio, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[fra], paese=[FR], abstract=
The paper examines Althusser's readings of Gramsci, from the first critical notes and annotations to his writings on the crisis of Marxism. It highlights the profound ambivalence of Althusser's interpretations. On the one hand, Gramsci is presented as a precursor, as the only figure within the Marxist tradition deemed to have attempted to think the superstructure, and in particular the political. On the other side, the Gramscian corpus is criticized as the paradigmatic instance of a conception of temporality and politics with which Althusser is in disagreement. Regarding the Althusserian critique, we here identify two distinct phases: starting out from a critique of the lack of knowledge of the specific status of science in general, especially of the science of history, characteristic of the second half of the sixties, Althusser would, in the late seventies, formulate a critique of the Gramscian concept of hegemony which, in his view, erases the question of class domination.
, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Actuel Marx], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[57], relazioni_numero_issue=[], relazioni_start=[62], relazioni_end=[81], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150101-20151231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Paris], relazioni_editore=[Edition Chilienne], relazioni_paese=[FR], soggettivoc=[Althusser, Louis, Egemonia], subjectvoc=[Althusser, Louis, Hegemony], note_riservate=, source=ProQuest, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020719, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=}]
