After the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, an attitude spread inside Marxist movements and parties, according to which every mass movement of the subaltern classes was celebrated as an ascetic redemption of the "last" and of the "poor" men, while every prosaic and "bourgeois" demand for a development of the productive forces was ignored, in a sort of messianic wait for a bourgeois society's palingenesis. Antonio Gramsci was reluctant towards this tendency. He was interested instead in building and defending the new revolutionary State (Bolsheviks as a sort of "aristocracy of statesman"), being aware of the arduous and contradictory process of construction of the new social order. Hence it springs the concern of Italian historical materialism in phenomena such as Americanism and Fordism and towards the industrial production's techniques of organization. A concern shared by Gramsci with Lenin, according to whom the revolutionary State needs to assimilate every scientific achievement as a useful tool to ensure the development of the Soviet country and to overcome a generalized misery and a backwardness that endangered its survival.
Available online: Materialismo storico (Accessed January 9, 2017)
SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020528, livello=AP, titolo=Gramsci e la Russia sovietica: il materialismo storico e la critica del populismo, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Losurdo, Domenico], autorevoc=[Losurdo, Domenico], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-000129], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Losurdo, Domenico, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=December 2016, forma_normalizzata=20161201-20161231, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[ita], abstract=
After the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, an attitude spread inside Marxist movements and parties, according to which every mass movement of the subaltern classes was celebrated as an ascetic redemption of the "last" and of the "poor" men, while every prosaic and "bourgeois" demand for a development of the productive forces was ignored, in a sort of messianic wait for a bourgeois society's palingenesis. Antonio Gramsci was reluctant towards this tendency. He was interested instead in building and defending the new revolutionary State (Bolsheviks as a sort of "aristocracy of statesman"), being aware of the arduous and contradictory process of construction of the new social order. Hence it springs the concern of Italian historical materialism in phenomena such as Americanism and Fordism and towards the industrial production's techniques of organization. A concern shared by Gramsci with Lenin, according to whom the revolutionary State needs to assimilate every scientific achievement as a useful tool to ensure the development of the Soviet country and to overcome a generalized misery and a backwardness that endangered its survival.
Available online: Materialismo storico (Accessed January 9, 2017)
, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Materialismo storico], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[1], relazioni_numero_issue=[1-2], relazioni_start=[18], relazioni_end=[41], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2016], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20160101-20161231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Urbino], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[ITA], soggettivoc=[Populismo, Americanismo Fordismo, Materialismo Storico], subjectvoc=[Populism, Americanism Fordism, Historical Materialism], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020528, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20160101-20161231}]
