La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org

  • Nosella, Paolo Ensino médio unitário ou multiforme?

    The text defends two ideas: the first one affirms that high school is the strategic educational level in the system and has a pedagogical meaning in itself. Therefore, it is considered that it is a mistake to define it as intermediate, heteronomous between the grades of elementary school and university or the job market. The second idea questions that an author such as Antonio Gramsci could be used to justify both theoretically and dialectically an early professionalizing program for high school. This assertion is based on the philological and hermeneutic analysis of Gramsci’s texts. The study concludes that the implementation of quality unitary high schools in Brazil, requires deep reform of the regular high school, especially in the public sector.


    Available online: redalyc.org

    (Accessed July 8, 2016)
    TRADUZIONE DI: Revista Brasileira de Educação, 60, January - March, 2015, pp. 121 - 142
    SOGGETTI:Educazione (Pedagogia); Dialettica; Scuola Unitaria





    SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020131, livello=AP, titolo=Ensino médio unitário ou multiforme?, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Nosella, Paolo], autorevoc=[Nosella, Paolo], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-003534], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Nosella, Paolo, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[por], paese=[BR], abstract=

    The text defends two ideas: the first one affirms that high school is the strategic educational level in the system and has a pedagogical meaning in itself. Therefore, it is considered that it is a mistake to define it as intermediate, heteronomous between the grades of elementary school and university or the job market. The second idea questions that an author such as Antonio Gramsci could be used to justify both theoretically and dialectically an early professionalizing program for high school. This assertion is based on the philological and hermeneutic analysis of Gramsci’s texts. The study concludes that the implementation of quality unitary high schools in Brazil, requires deep reform of the regular high school, especially in the public sector.

    Available online: redalyc.org

    (Accessed July 8, 2016), table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Revista Brasileira de Educação], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[], relazioni_numero_volume=[20], relazioni_numero_issue=[60], relazioni_start=[121], relazioni_end=[142], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[January - March, 2015], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20150101-20150331], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[Rio de Janeir], relazioni_editore=[Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação], relazioni_paese=[BR], soggettivoc=[Educazione (Pedagogia), Dialettica, Scuola Unitaria], subjectvoc=[Education, Dialectic, Unitary School], note_riservate=, source=redalyc.org, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0020131, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=, dateIssued=}]