La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org

  • McSweeney, John The Absence of Class: Critical Development, NGOs and the Misuse of Gramsci's Concept of Counter-Hegemony

    This article argues that a number of concepts originally developed by Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) have been misapplied by critical development theorists in their engagement with NGOs. This applies particularly to ‘hegemony’ and ‘counter-hegemony’ because they have been detached from the ontological gravity provided by class. However, Gramsci’s terms, to be analytically comprehendible, should be defined in relation to the agency of class. Yet the treatment of class as an emancipatory agent has been neglected by development studies. This hinders a proper recognition of the real worth of Gramsci’s project of counter-hegemony, particularly in light of the crisis afflicting the present conjuncture.

    FA PARTE DI: Progress in Development Studies, 3, July 2014, pp. 275 - 285





    SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019815, livello=AP, titolo=The Absence of Class, sottotitolo=Critical Development, NGOs and the Misuse of Gramsci's Concept of Counter-Hegemony, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[McSweeney, John], autorevoc=[McSweeney, John], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007686], responsability_ruolo=[autore], first_author=McSweeney, John, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], paese=[GB], abstract=

    This article argues that a number of concepts originally developed by Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) have been misapplied by critical development theorists in their engagement with NGOs. This applies particularly to ‘hegemony’ and ‘counter-hegemony’ because they have been detached from the ontological gravity provided by class. However, Gramsci’s terms, to be analytically comprehendible, should be defined in relation to the agency of class. Yet the treatment of class as an emancipatory agent has been neglected by development studies. This hinders a proper recognition of the real worth of Gramsci’s project of counter-hegemony, particularly in light of the crisis afflicting the present conjuncture.

    , table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Progress in Development Studies], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[14], relazioni_numero_issue=[3], relazioni_start=[275], relazioni_end=[285], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[July 2014], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20140701-20140731], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[London], relazioni_editore=[Sage Publications], relazioni_paese=[GB], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019815, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=, dateIssued=}]