Chodor, Tom Not Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater: A Gramscian Response to Post-Hegemony

This article offers a Gramscian response to the theory of post-hegemony, suggesting that its rejection of Gramsci rests on misrepresentations of his work. Through a closer engagement with this work, the article outlines the ways in which Gramscian analysis can in fact complement the insights of post-hegemony in analysing the ways in which the social order is secured and the strategies of resistance to this order. This combination of Gramscian and post-hegemonic insights, the article argues, offers a more nuanced and comprehensive insight into power, radical politics and resistance in the twenty-first century, an insight which risks being lost in post-hegemony's rejection of Gramsci and his work. The utility of this combined approach is illustrated via four short vignettes from contemporary Latin America: the emergence of the student protest movement in Chile since 2011; the Caracazo in Venezuela; the Argentine crisis in 2001; and the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela.
Available in: www.tandfonline.com/

SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019631, livello=AP, titolo=Not Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater, sottotitolo=A Gramscian Response to Post-Hegemony, tipo_titolo=, responsability_namePart=[Chodor, Tom], autorevoc=[Chodor, Tom], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007682], responsability_ruolo=[autore], first_author=Chodor, Tom, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=Abingdon ; Oxfordshire, editore=Routledge ; Taylor & Francis, forma_visualizzata=2014, forma_normalizzata=20140101-20141231, tipo_data=, consistenza=pp. 489-502, lingua=[eng], paese=[GB], abstract=This article offers a Gramscian response to the theory of post-hegemony, suggesting that its rejection of Gramsci rests on misrepresentations of his work. Through a closer engagement with this work, the article outlines the ways in which Gramscian analysis can in fact complement the insights of post-hegemony in analysing the ways in which the social order is secured and the strategies of resistance to this order. This combination of Gramscian and post-hegemonic insights, the article argues, offers a more nuanced and comprehensive insight into power, radical politics and resistance in the twenty-first century, an insight which risks being lost in post-hegemony's rejection of Gramsci and his work. The utility of this combined approach is illustrated via four short vignettes from contemporary Latin America: the emergence of the student protest movement in Chile since 2011; the Caracazo in Venezuela; the Argentine crisis in 2001; and the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela. Available in: www.tandfonline.com/, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Contemporary Politics vol. 20, issue 4], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[], relazioni_numero_issue=[], relazioni_start=[], relazioni_end=[], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2014], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20140101-20141231], relazioni_tipo_data=[], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019631, recordOrigin=, condizioni_accesso=, dateIssued=20140101-20141231}]