Stephen, Matthew D. Alter-Globalism as Counter-Hegemony: Evaluating the 'Postmodern Prince'.

This article seeks to provide a critical analysis of the alter-globalisation movement as a potential 'postmodern Prince' as advanced by Stephen Gill. The article proposes that the social forces aligned under the rubric of alter-globalism have always had intractable difficulties articulating a postmodern Prince, and that in contrast to Gill's appropriation of Gramsci, these difficulties can be usefully understood through a reading of Gramsci which is attentive to the problems of collective political action. Recent debate among key participants at the World Social Forum (WSF) is used as a case study for analysing the possibility of formulating a common master-frame or strategy for social transformation. It is at the WSF that the problems of articulating a postmodern Prince have been most clearly confronted. It is shown that the weaknesses of alter-globalism can be understood, pace Gill, through Gramsci's own theory of social transformation as evinced in the modern Prince. This underlines the need for further investigation of the agents of progressive politics in an era of global social transformation.

SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019507, livello=AP, titolo=Alter-Globalism as Counter-Hegemony: Evaluating the 'Postmodern Prince'., sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=uniform, responsability_namePart=[Stephen, Matthew D.], autorevoc=[Stephen, Matthew D.], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007583], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Stephen, Matthew D., forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=This article seeks to provide a critical analysis of the alter-globalisation movement as a potential 'postmodern Prince' as advanced by Stephen Gill. The article proposes that the social forces aligned under the rubric of alter-globalism have always had intractable difficulties articulating a postmodern Prince, and that in contrast to Gill's appropriation of Gramsci, these difficulties can be usefully understood through a reading of Gramsci which is attentive to the problems of collective political action. Recent debate among key participants at the World Social Forum (WSF) is used as a case study for analysing the possibility of formulating a common master-frame or strategy for social transformation. It is at the WSF that the problems of articulating a postmodern Prince have been most clearly confronted. It is shown that the weaknesses of alter-globalism can be understood, pace Gill, through Gramsci's own theory of social transformation as evinced in the modern Prince. This underlines the need for further investigation of the agents of progressive politics in an era of global social transformation., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Globalizations], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[6], relazioni_numero_issue=[4], relazioni_start=[483], relazioni_end=[498], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2009], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20091000-20091200], relazioni_tipo_data=[inferred], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[Taylor & Francis], relazioni_paese=[], soggettivoc=[Globalizzazione, Egemonia, Contro], subjectvoc=[Globalization, Hegemony counter], note_riservate=, source=IGS-2009, recordInfo=francescogiasi@libero.it, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019507, recordOrigin=MODS.2CB338696FF8105, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20091000-20091200}]