Glassman, Jim Cracking Hegemony in Thailand: Gramsci, Bourdieu and the Dialectics of Rebellion

Gramsci's notion of "hegemony," like Bourdieu's concept of "habitus," seems designed to explain accommodation to existing social structures, rather than resistance. In this paper, however, I draw from the Prison Notebooks some arguments that contribute to a Gramscian understanding of how hegemony may break apart under the weight of the same uneven development processes central to hegemony. Drawing also from Bourdieu, I argue that the conceptions of "hegemony" and "habitus" inscribe the possibility of resistance within the embodied experience of accommodation to class rule. I then elaborate a dialectical, Gramscian-Bourdieusian account of the Red Shirt movement in Thailand, showing that the seeds for the destruction of royalist hegemony in Thailand have been sown in the embodied processes of accommodation to ruling class hegemony. The breadth and depth of challenges to this hegemony, moreover, are evident not only from the activities of the Red Shirt movement and regional discontent in Northern and Northeast Thailand but from the resistance of working class women to attempts to police their sexuality and limit their consumerism. The refusal of Thai elites to accept the breadth and depth of Thailand's dispositional transformation has legitimised - in their eyes - the brutal crackdown on Red Shirt protestors that resulted in the April-May 2010 massacres. Yet repression can only kill off political leaders and specific parties; it will not likely derail the growing resentment of ordinary Thais over elitist class rule

SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019005, livello=AP, titolo=Cracking Hegemony in Thailand: Gramsci, Bourdieu and the Dialectics of Rebellion, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=uniform, responsability_namePart=[Glassman, Jim], autorevoc=[Glassman, Jim], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007429], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Glassman, Jim, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=Gramsci's notion of "hegemony," like Bourdieu's concept of "habitus," seems designed to explain accommodation to existing social structures, rather than resistance. In this paper, however, I draw from the Prison Notebooks some arguments that contribute to a Gramscian understanding of how hegemony may break apart under the weight of the same uneven development processes central to hegemony. Drawing also from Bourdieu, I argue that the conceptions of "hegemony" and "habitus" inscribe the possibility of resistance within the embodied experience of accommodation to class rule. I then elaborate a dialectical, Gramscian-Bourdieusian account of the Red Shirt movement in Thailand, showing that the seeds for the destruction of royalist hegemony in Thailand have been sown in the embodied processes of accommodation to ruling class hegemony. The breadth and depth of challenges to this hegemony, moreover, are evident not only from the activities of the Red Shirt movement and regional discontent in Northern and Northeast Thailand but from the resistance of working class women to attempts to police their sexuality and limit their consumerism. The refusal of Thai elites to accept the breadth and depth of Thailand's dispositional transformation has legitimised - in their eyes - the brutal crackdown on Red Shirt protestors that resulted in the April-May 2010 massacres. Yet repression can only kill off political leaders and specific parties; it will not likely derail the growing resentment of ordinary Thais over elitist class rule, table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Journal of Contemporary Asia], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[41], relazioni_numero_issue=[1], relazioni_start=[25], relazioni_end=[46], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2011], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20110100-20110100], relazioni_tipo_data=[inferred], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Studi di caso, Tailandia, Bourdieu, Pierre], subjectvoc=[case studies, Thailand, Bourdieu, Pierre], note_riservate=, source=Igs-Int, recordInfo=lrighi@fondazionegramsci.org, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0019005, recordOrigin=MODS.2CAD3E6C84FCE85, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20110100-20110100}]