La Bibliografia gramsciana, fondata da John M. Cammett, ora curata da Francesco Giasi e da Maria Luisa Righi con la collaborazione dell'International Gramsci Society raccoglie volumi, saggi e articoli su Gramsci pubblicati dal 1922 e pubblicazioni e traduzioni degli scritti di Gramsci dal 1927. Per aggiornamenti, integrazioni o correzioni scrivere a: bibliografiagramsciana@fondazionegramsci.org

  • Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies
    This article addresses the scholarly lacunae surrounding Antonio Gramsci's contributions to folklore studies in the English-speaking world. It contends that Gramsci's critique of folklore has often been misunderstood because it has not been read in tandem with his comments on language, common sense, and religion, nor has it been contextualized by his discussions of distinctions among folklore, philosophy, and science. This article provides a close reading of Gramsci's commentaries and draws a brief comparison with the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer in order to adapt these ideas for contemporary research, reclaim folklore's political legitimacy, and promote a critical folklore studies that would overtly address political dilemmas and human suffering.
    FA PARTE DI: Journal of Folklore Research, 47.3, 2010, pp. 221 - 252
    SOGGETTI:Folklore





    SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018457, livello=AP, titolo=Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=uniform, responsability_namePart=[Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys], autorevoc=[Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007305], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=This article addresses the scholarly lacunae surrounding Antonio Gramsci's contributions to folklore studies in the English-speaking world. It contends that Gramsci's critique of folklore has often been misunderstood because it has not been read in tandem with his comments on language, common sense, and religion, nor has it been contextualized by his discussions of distinctions among folklore, philosophy, and science. This article provides a close reading of Gramsci's commentaries and draws a brief comparison with the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer in order to adapt these ideas for contemporary research, reclaim folklore's political legitimacy, and promote a critical folklore studies that would overtly address political dilemmas and human suffering., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Journal of Folklore Research], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[], relazioni_numero_issue=[47.3], relazioni_start=[221], relazioni_end=[252], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2010], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20101010-20112310], relazioni_tipo_data=[inferred], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[US], soggettivoc=[Folklore], subjectvoc=[Folklore], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=francescogiasi@libero.it, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018457, recordOrigin=MODS.2CA762208358AF2, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20101010-20112310}]