Kim, Sook-Jin - Wainwright, Joel When seed fails: The contested nature of neoliberalism in South Korea

In recent years, many geographers have examined the ways that the production of nature has changed as a result of neoliberal practices. In this paper we examine a conflict in South Korea that started when some Chinese-cabbage seeds were affected by a virus, causing crop failure. This failure came shortly after liberalization in the Korean seed industry led to foreign ownership of the firm that sold the seed. We focus in particular on the farmers' creative political responses - and their subsequent defeat in court. Drawing on Antonio Gramsci's insights on politics, science, and law, we examine how the seed failure came to be evaluated through scientific and legal practices. We argue that the adjudication of the truth of the seed failure through science and law reveals how socionatures are contested under prevailing hegemonic conditions. These conditions are both general and specific: although law and science are relatively hegemonic spheres of truth-production in all capitalist societies, the ways that the seeds were disputed and evaluated were distinctly Korean.

SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018393, livello=AP, titolo=When seed fails: The contested nature of neoliberalism in South Korea, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=uniform, responsability_namePart=[Kim, Sook-Jin, Wainwright, Joel], autorevoc=[Kim, Sook-Jin, Wainwright, Joel], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007286, IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007285], responsability_ruolo=[author, author], first_author=Kim, Sook-Jin, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=In recent years, many geographers have examined the ways that the production of nature has changed as a result of neoliberal practices. In this paper we examine a conflict in South Korea that started when some Chinese-cabbage seeds were affected by a virus, causing crop failure. This failure came shortly after liberalization in the Korean seed industry led to foreign ownership of the firm that sold the seed. We focus in particular on the farmers' creative political responses - and their subsequent defeat in court. Drawing on Antonio Gramsci's insights on politics, science, and law, we examine how the seed failure came to be evaluated through scientific and legal practices. We argue that the adjudication of the truth of the seed failure through science and law reveals how socionatures are contested under prevailing hegemonic conditions. These conditions are both general and specific: although law and science are relatively hegemonic spheres of truth-production in all capitalist societies, the ways that the seeds were disputed and evaluated were distinctly Korean., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Geoforum], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[41], relazioni_numero_issue=[], relazioni_start=[723], relazioni_end=[733], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2010], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20101010-20112310], relazioni_tipo_data=[inferred], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Neoliberalismo, Studi di caso, Corea], subjectvoc=[Neo liberalism, case studies, Korea], note_riservate=, source=IGS-2010, recordInfo=francescogiasi@libero.it, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018393, recordOrigin=MODS.2CA74882DD07D63, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20101010-20112310}]