Brittain, James The Differing Revolutionary Positions of Gramsci and Trotsky in Relation to Classical Marxism, the Peasantry, and the Majority World

While differing arguments are found within the discipline, the principal denominator uniting theories of Marxist revolution is that organized class-based struggle can consequentially result in a more equitable society, one which surpasses a capitalist mode of production. Augmenting Marx's work on the growing realities of the competitive capitalist system, Lenin highlighted that as capitalism expands it increasingly becomes a model not of competing capitalist producers but one of centralized economic monopolies within global society. With this political economic shift in global capitalism, Gramsci and Trotsky penned differing theoretical responses toward the importance of revolutionary tactics in an age of imperialism. It is in this vein that this article delves into the varied responses of permanent revolution and war of position/manoeuvre, while illustrating which theory most effectively demonstrates the capacity and emancipatory efforts of peoples located in countries outside of the imperial nations (i.e. the majority world). Available on the web from: http://journals.sfu.ca/sss/index.php/sss/article/view/16 (Accessed April 8, 2010).

SolrDocument[{id=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018185, livello=AP, titolo=The Differing Revolutionary Positions of Gramsci and Trotsky in Relation to Classical Marxism, the Peasantry, and the Majority World, sottotitolo=, tipo_titolo=uniform, responsability_namePart=[Brittain, James], autorevoc=[Brittain, James], responsability_codice=[IT-GRAMSCI-EACCPF0001-007220], responsability_ruolo=[author], first_author=Brittain, James, forma_parallela=, responsability=, note_edizione_traduzione=, luogo_pubblicazione=, editore=, forma_visualizzata=, forma_normalizzata=, tipo_data=, consistenza=, lingua=[eng], abstract=While differing arguments are found within the discipline, the principal denominator uniting theories of Marxist revolution is that organized class-based struggle can consequentially result in a more equitable society, one which surpasses a capitalist mode of production. Augmenting Marx's work on the growing realities of the competitive capitalist system, Lenin highlighted that as capitalism expands it increasingly becomes a model not of competing capitalist producers but one of centralized economic monopolies within global society. With this political economic shift in global capitalism, Gramsci and Trotsky penned differing theoretical responses toward the importance of revolutionary tactics in an age of imperialism. It is in this vein that this article delves into the varied responses of permanent revolution and war of position/manoeuvre, while illustrating which theory most effectively demonstrates the capacity and emancipatory efforts of peoples located in countries outside of the imperial nations (i.e. the majority world). Available on the web from: http://journals.sfu.ca/sss/index.php/sss/article/view/16 (Accessed April 8, 2010)., table_contents=, titolo_collana=, collocazione=, relazioni_titolo_collegato=[Socialist Studies: The Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies], relazioni_identificativo=[], relazioni_tipo_relazione=[padre], relazioni_numero_volume=[3], relazioni_numero_issue=[2], relazioni_start=[], relazioni_end=[], relazioni_pagine=[], relazioni_forma_visualizzata=[2007], relazioni_forma_normalizzata=[20070100-20070100], relazioni_tipo_data=[inferred], relazioni_luogo=[], relazioni_editore=[], relazioni_paese=[GB], soggettivoc=[Trockij, Lev Davidovi? (Bronstein), Rivoluzione], subjectvoc=[Trotsky, Leon, Revolution], note_riservate=, source=, recordInfo=lrighi@fondazionegramsci.org, identifier=IT-GRAMSCI-BIB00001-0018185, recordOrigin=MODS.2CA1C2306EF3192, condizioni_accesso=public, dateIssued=20070100-20070100}]